A USA TODAY NETWORK-Tennessee investigation: Lawmakers used campaign donations to pay for hundreds of thousands of dollars in purchases in 2016, raising ethics and accountability questions.
Ayrika Whitney, The Tennessean
1 of 5
USA TODAY NETWORK – Tennessee reporters Dave Boucher and Joel Ebert investigate potential misuse of campaign funds and “per diem” funds by state lawmakers.
Ayrika Whitney, The Tennessean
2 of 5
The report indicates Durham broke at least six individual state laws, but the board arrived at the 500 violations number based on Durham purportedly breaking the same law many times. The audit is the culmination of an investigation from June 2016.
Dave Boucher, Karen Kraft / The Tennessean
3 of 5
Durham spent more than $10,000 in campaign funds on purchases prohibited by law, according to the report.
Joel Ebert, Dave Boucher, Kyleah Starling/The Tennessean
4 of 5
Former State Rep. Jeremy Durham was part of real estate transactions structured in a way that raised eyebrows among real estate attorneys and former prosecutors.
Karen Kraft / The Tennessean
5 of 5
How are lawmakers using your money?
An investigation into campaign finances usage
Jeremy Durham final campaign finance audit report: What does it say
Highlights of Durham audit investigation
Real estate transactions involving Jeremy Durham have attorneys puzzled
Federal authorities are poised to probe a series of potentially illegal donations and contributions involving state Sen. Brian Kelsey, five other state lawmakers — including House Majority Leader Glen Casada — and four political action committees.
The flow of money into and out of Kelsey’s failed 2016 congressional bid is the subject of a complaint filed Wednesday with the Federal Election Commission and a letter sent to the U.S. Department of Justice.
The complaint and letter stem from a USA TODAY NETWORK-Tennessee investigation earlier this month which found Kelsey and others may have been involved in illegal straw donations, inappropriate coordination and other possible wrongdoing.
“In order to disguise the illegal transfer of prohibited state money into his federal race, it appears that Kelsey concocted another illegal scheme to pass the money through a dark money daisy chain and straw donor reimbursement scheme,” said Brendan Fischer, an attorney and Federal Election Commission reform program director with Washington, D.C.-based Campaign Legal Center, one of the organizations to file the FEC complaint.
“Kelsey appears to have stacked legal violation on top of legal violation, and we anticipate that federal authorities will take this very seriously.”
Kelsey and the group of donors previously denied the allegations.
A coincidence that ‘would defy belief’
In addition to the donations from lawmakers and others, the complaint also highlights a money trail from Kelsey’s state campaign through state and federal political action committees to a federal advocacy organization that purchased radios advertisements supporting Kelsey’s unsuccessful 2016 campaign for Congress.
The committees include:
- Citizens 4 Ethics in Government, a federal political action committee founded by controversial GOP donor Andy Miller;
- The Standard Club PAC, an organization created by Josh Smith, the owner of a private Nashville dinner club frequented by Kelsey and other lawmakers, and;
- The American Conservative Union, a national advocacy organization that helps Republicans.
The complaint says the suggestion the transactions between Kesley and the PACs were merely a coincidence “would defy belief.”
“The much simpler and more plausible inference is that Kelsey (or his agents) routed the funds to pay the ACU to pay for the advertising,” the document says.
“There is reason to believe that ACU did not merely have funds fortuitously drop into its lap from the very candidate for whom it was preparing to advertise.”
The complaint further alleges Kelsey, along with Casada, Sens. Steve Dickerson and Dolores Gresham, and Reps. Ron Gant and Martin Daniel, as well as a failed Republican legislative candidate, violated federal campaign finance laws, while even labeling the legislators straw donors.
Also mentioned in the complaint are Thomas A. “Thomsen” Smith, who helped raise money for Kelsey’s congressional bid, and Troy Brewer, an oft-used treasurer for Republicans throughout Tennessee. Both are mentioned given their connections to the entities involved in the alleged money trail.
The complaint relies heavily on a USA TODAY NETWORK-Tennessee analysis, which outlined money moving from Kelsey’s state campaign account to lawmakers who had also made contributions to his federal campaign.
A political consultant with knowledge of the Tennessee lawmaker’s transactions previously said Kelsey asked multiple state legislators to make a federal contribution in exchange for a donation to their own state campaigns.
All of the lawmakers named previously denied the allegations, calling them “ridiculous” and “erroneous.”
What they’re accused of and why it’s wrong
There are five specification allegations contained in the report:
1. Straw donation violations
Federal law prohibits donors from making contributions in the name of another person. This practice, known as “straw donations,” may provide candidates or committees money that exceeds the allowable limit.
Kelsey is accused of violating straw donor prohibitions by purportedly orchestrating the money trial from his state campaign account to the ACU. He may have also violated straw donor laws when he gave campaign contributions to lawmakers who provided donations to his federal campaign, according to the complaint.
The PACs and other state lawmakers may have also violated straw donor bans by their participation the contributions, according to the complaint.
2. ACU’s contributions constitute coordinated communications, exceed limits
When the ACU spent $80,000 on radio advertisements in support of Kelsey’s failed congressional bid, the complaint alleges the purchases were likely made at the suggestion of Kelsey or an agent.
The complaint states the ACU’s actions meet the definition of coordinated communications, which means the $80,000 would count as a contribution to Kelsey. That amount would far exceed the $2,700 federal contribution limit, according to the complaint.
3. Kelsey accepted donations in excess of federal limits
If the ACU’s radio advertisement amounts to an $80,000 contribution, then the complaint states Kelsey accepted a donation that far exceeds federal limits.
4. Kelsey knowingly and willfully violated federal soft money prohibition
Those filing the complaint argue Kelsey violated a ban on soft money, which prohibits federal candidates from using state campaign donations in a federal election.
5. ACU failed to report contributions for independent expenditures
The complaint notes the various contributions from the Standard Club PAC and Citizens 4 Ethics in Government to the ACU that were made around the same time the ACU purchased ads for Kelsey.
Pointing to the ACU’s federal disclosure, the complaint argues the organization needs to report more information about the sources of funding that helped pay for the radio ads in support of Kelsey.
Who filed the complaint?
The complaint comes from Washington, D.C.-based nonprofits Campaign Legal Center and Democracy 21.
Last year, the organizations encouraged federal election officials to enforce campaign finance laws, arguing President Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton’s campaigns illegally coordinated with several super PACs.
Earlier this year, the Campaign Legal Center sued the U.S. Department of Justice in an effort to force the release of emails and correspondence between the agency and a pro-Trump super PAC.
What happens next?
The complaint calls for an Federal Election Commission investigation and levy penalties for any violations. The letter to the DOJ requests a formal investigation.
There’s no guarantee any investigation occurs, or whether any possible probe confirms wrongdoing.
The FEC reviews all complaints filed on a case-by-case basis. All enforcement matters are confidential until they are resolved, according to the agency.
The complaint against Kelsey and other lawmakers is not the first time Tennessee politicians have faced federal scrutiny. In the past, the FEC has probed the finances of Sen. Jim Tracy and former lawmaker Joe Carr.
Read or Share this story: http://www.tennessean.com/story/news/politics/2017/06/21/fec-complaint-sen-brian-kesley-others-broke-campaign-finance-laws/408804001/