The writer is the International Relations Coordinator for Im Tirtzu, an extra-parliamentary movement that works to strengthen and advance the values of Zionism in Israel and fights delegitimization of the Jewish State.
Much of the recent public discourse in Israel has focused on the proposed academic code of ethics, written by author of the IDF Code of Ethics, Prof. Asa Kasher, which aims to set clear guidelines regarding the role of political activity in academia.
Among other things, the code recognizes and seeks to address the widespread phenomenon wherein certain professors – under the guise of academic freedom –use their position to subject students to politicized material that reflects only one side of the academic debate – their own – while at the same time prohibiting other points of view, particularly from students.
Contrary to the inaccurate claims of the code’s detractors, the code does not in any way stifle political debate or ban political discussion from the classroom.
The code is a breath of fresh air for Israeli academia that aims to create an environment where students are presented with both sides of the discussion, which allows them to critically think, engage in vibrant academic exchange, and arrive at their own conclusions. That is the purpose of academia.
Unfortunately, many professors believe that their academic mandate gives them the right to preach only one side of the debate, while bullying and berating students who voice opposing views.
In more extreme, but not uncommon, instances, right-wing students are afraid to voice their opinions in class or to write pro-Israel content in their papers, out of concern that their grades will be negatively affected.
This is not academic freedom. This is not pluralism. This is coercion in the service of indoctrination.
Many opponents of the code mistakenly conflate academic freedom with freedom of speech. But what is lawfully guaranteed to an individual outside of the classroom does not translate to what should be permitted inside of the classroom.
While it might be protected free speech for professors to curse at right-wing students in the hallways, call politicians neo-Nazis in class and scold students who show up to class in IDF uniform, is that what we want to see in our universities?
All should agree that while one’s right to engage in blatantly racist dialogue is protected free speech, such behavior is unacceptable in the classroom – and rightfully so.
Similarly, while it might be protected free speech for professors to curse at right-wing students in the hallways, call politicians neo-Nazis in class and scold students who show up to class in IDF uniform, is that what we want to see in our universities?
It is precisely for these reasons that academic ethical codes are needed, just as ethical codes are needed for doctors, lawyers and nearly every other profession.
Incidentally, this is not a new or unprecedented initiative: as explained by Prof. Kasher, the proposed code was modeled after the ethical code of the American Association of University Professors, one that has been in existence for over a century.
The code also addresses the unhealthy role that radical political organizations play in academia.
Today in several leading Israeli universities, students can receive scholarships and academic credits in exchange for interning in radical NGOs, including B’Tselem, which promotes international pressure on Israel and accuses Israel of war crimes, and HaMoked that petitions the Supreme Court on behalf of terrorists and their families.
University legal clinics are also being used to promote radical politicized agendas, resulting in instances where legal clinics are used to defend convicted terrorists in court and to file judicial appeals against state policy, often to the virtual exclusion of representing other potential claimants.
Much of this political activity stems from another issue that the code addresses: academic appointments based on ideological preference rather than academic merit.
Entire departments have become hotbeds of academic groupthink that reject professors who don’t conform to their worldview. This not only suppresses pluralism and diversity, but leads to absurd situations like last year’s decision by Ben-Gurion University’s Middle East Studies Department to unanimously award “Breaking the Silence” with a 20,000 NIS human rights prize.
The fact that over 20 professors would all vote to award a prize to the most controversial organization in Israel highlights the severity of the situation.
In 2010, Israel’s Council for Higher Education came out with an official decision that all attempts the politicize academia should be rejected. Seven years have since passed, and universities have done nothing to address this issue.
Let’s bring pluralism, diversity, and basic sanity to Israeli academia.